I recently went on a vacation and I took Claire with me. You may
remember about Claire – she is what I call my inner cave girl and she is in
charge of my instincts. Normally, I don’t give her much thought…she does her
job and I go about my business. But this trip was an all-inclusive cruise, and
I thought things might feel more “primitive.” I guessed that social
interactions would be less complicated if the exchange of money was removed
from the mix. I imagined a week of simple living: being isolated on a boat
in-route to some equally isolated islands, and that it would be fun to get a
glimpse at things from a cave girl's perspective. But I could not have been
more wrong.
The ship was 17 stories tall. It had 3 floors of common dining, 3
public areas (one with two rock-climbing walls and a carousel,) 12 restaurants,
5 bars, 4 theaters, a casino, 5 pools, 6 hot tubs, a track, a gym, an ice
skating rink, a few stores, and a professional photography studio. Like Claire
might have, I was feeling completely out of my element. More importantly to my
social experiment, the ship held 6,500 passengers and 2,000 crew – WAY more
people than Claire would have encountered in her daily life as a cave-dweller.
Her part of my head would have been able to keep track of 150 people max. But
there was hope. We would be taking several on-land excursions where there would
be far less people, so perhaps I could still get a glimpse of "life less
complicated." I would continue to process my social encounters with Claire’s
perspective in mind, but predictably, things got cloudier before they became
clear.
Our first on-land stop was a small boat excursion to an isolated lagoon. On our
way, we passed a few celebrity homes, which were enthusiastically pointed out
by our tour guide. The properties were impressive and garnered lots of oohs and
ahhs, but I was looking forward to some relaxing beach time. Unfortunately, I
chose the wrong beach. After about 20 minutes in what I thought was my lounger
for the day, I was asked to leave. Turned out I was not a VIP and that strip of
sand was reserved especially for the privileged few. I was completely surprised
and enormously embarrassed. I even teared up a little as I gathered my things.
Why should I feel bad? It was an honest mistake! But after processing that
event from Claire’s point of view, my reaction made more sense. Way back in her
day, Claire’s tribe pooled their resources because their survival depended on
it. If anyone didn’t share all they had hunted or gathered, the consequences could
be serious. So humans developed a handy habit known as "cheater
detection." When tribe members kept each other honest about what food they
had to share, they had a better shot at surviving – but they also kept each
other on more equal social footing. Since everyone contributed, everyone was important. So at a primitive level, I had been caught “cheating,” or behaving
as if I was more important than someone else. So I instinctively,
uncontrollably, felt ashamed. In that moment, Claire had taken over. But I was
also sad because social stratification had found me, even on what could be
considered a deserted island. I was hoping for equality and experienced the
opposite. I needed WAY more rum punch.
I learned another cave girl lesson at our next on-land excursion when I
attempted to barter for a dress I liked. The seller told me it cost 18 dollars,
but I only had 15. I asked if she’d take what I had and after a few moments she
said, “Yes. I will take 3 dollars out of my purse so you can have this dress.”
At first I thought she was just trying to guilt me into giving her the initial
asking price and proceeded with the purchase, but later I realized there was
more going on. The more resources a person has, be it money or clothes or food,
the more power they have. From a prehistoric point of view, I had just
descended from a luxury cruise liner and relieved a fellow human of some of her
power. Claire’s perspective was beginning to be a bit of a downer. Feeling bad
about yourself is not generally why people take a vacation, but I had one more
chance to have a simple, positive, cave dweller interchange on this trip.
But it was not to be. There was more unequal distribution of
resources on our third and final excursion. My fellow travelers and I attempted
to use our credit cards at the local restaurants only to learn that the most
recent hurricane had wiped-out their ability to process those cards. The locals
needed cash, but we did not have enough. They were cut off from a technology
that could help them survive. It did not seem fair. I thought of the incredible
wealth I had floated past days earlier. With a fraction of their incomes, those
celebrities could probably fix this issue. But even out here, on a group of
isolated islands, stratification appeared to be ingrained in modern human
culture. There were haves and have-nots -- and Claire did not approve. The only
resources that mattered in her time were resources she could see. And with a
tight-knit tribe, those resources were hard to hoard. Modern advancements like
credit allow us to attain resources, sometimes without earning what we
"own," and in turn exaggerate how much we are “contributing” to
society. We can look like we are successful but could be up to our ears in
debt. And why should we care what resources other people might have? Because
evolutionarily speaking, we unconsciously want to know enough about the people around us to
secure our safety. If someone else has enough resources of their own, there is
less of a chance they will try and take ours. Modern cues of “success” have
become clothing, cars, accessories, and the size of a home. But the ownership
of these resources can all be faked, so our specialized cheater detection is
harder to use. It's no wonder that we sometimes don't trust our neighbors. Thinking
like Claire on my vacation had shown me one way modern advancements have actually
set us humans back in terms of our ability to trust one other – and how Cavegirl
Claire, at least in one respect, had had it pretty good.
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2008). Primer for Center for Evolutionary Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara. https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/primer.html
Cummins, D. D. (1999). Cheater Detection is Modified by Social Rank. Evolution and Human Behavior 20: 229–248.
Francois, P., Fujiuarra, T. & van Ypersele, T. (2018). The origins of human prosociality: Cultural group selection in the workplace and laboratory. Science Advances - vol 4, no 9.
Waytz, A. (2017). The Psychology of Social Status. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-psychology-of-social/
© 2018 Penny Fie. All rights reserved.
References
Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2008). Primer for Center for Evolutionary Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara. https://www.cep.ucsb.edu/primer.html
Cummins, D. D. (1999). Cheater Detection is Modified by Social Rank. Evolution and Human Behavior 20: 229–248.
Francois, P., Fujiuarra, T. & van Ypersele, T. (2018). The origins of human prosociality: Cultural group selection in the workplace and laboratory. Science Advances - vol 4, no 9.
Waytz, A. (2017). The Psychology of Social Status. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-psychology-of-social/
Click on 'Congirl vs Cavegirl' above to see older posts. Comment below.
© 2018 Penny Fie. All rights reserved.
Comments
Post a Comment